Artiklar av Catarina Holtz

Hänskjutning till EPO:s Stora besvärskammare – behörighet och befogenhet – G 3/19 | NIR 4/2020

Referral to the EPO Enlarged Board of Appeal – competence and authority – G 3/19

Debatt. Besvärskamrarna vid EPO – uppfyller ledamöternas villkor artikel 6 Europeiska konventionen om mänskliga rättigheter och grundläggande friheter? | NIR 1/2018

Debate. The Boards of Appeal of the EPO – Do the conditions for their members meet the requirements of Article 6 of the European Convention on Human rights?

Vad betyder EPO:s beslut R 19/12 för besvärskamrarna? | NIR 4/2014

What is the Impact of EPO decision R 19/12 on its Boards of Appeal?

Invändning först efter patentbeslut. Kan detta ha haft inverkan på kravet på uppfinningshöjd vid EPO? | NIR 2/2009

Post-grant-opposition. Can this have an impact on the requirement of inventive step at the EPO?

EPO Case law on equivalance in novelty, inventive step and amendments. | NIR 3/1999

Article 55(1)(a) EPC. Abuce – Grace Period | NIR 1/1997

The Outer Limits of Patentability – Biotechnology | NIR 1/1996

Begränsningen av processmaterialet och besvärsrätten – rättsutveckling vid EPO | NIR 2/1994

The Limitation of Procedural Subject Matter and the Right to Appeal–the Development of Praxis at the EPO

Rättspraxis i EPO ang art 122 EPC "återställande av försutten tid". Särskilt om innebörden av omsorgskravet | NIR 2/1993

EPO Praxis of Art. 122 EPC "restitutio in integrum"

Notiser

Distinctiveness for non-traditional trademarks and the inherent distinctiveness for surface patterns (PMCA, PMÄ 14666-22)

Rättsfall | Sverige

In this case regarding a trademark application for a geometrical figure as a surface pattern, the PMCA provide guidelines in relation to distinctiveness in relation to surface trademarks, and particularly the assessment for its inherited distinctiveness. This case further elaborates on the responsibilities an applicant holds in relation to showing distinctiveness for signs, patterns or products that are not typically associated with being trademarks.

The balance of the law on the peace of the maritime grave at the wreck of Estonia and the journalistic interest (the Court of Appeal for Western Sweden, B 5637-22)

Rättsfall | Sverige

The balance of the law on the peace of the maritime grave at the wreck of Estonia and the journalistic interest (the Court of Appeal for Western Sweden, B 5637-22) Filip Jerneke and Stefan Widmark Introduction In this case, two persons were convicted for offence against the law on the peace of the maritime grave at the wreck of the passenger vessel Estonia after diving close to and filming the wreck for the purpose of making a documentary film. In this context, the most interesting aspect is how the court draws the line between the peace of the maritime grave and the journalistic interest.

Gross defamation – similar statements in different media resulting in different judgements (Stockholm District Court, B 568-21 and Svea Court of Appeal B 374-20)

Rättsfall | Sverige

Whether defamation is made in constitutionally protected or other media can have decisive effect. This is shown in two judgments from Stockholm District Court and the Svea Court of Appeal. The cases concern similar statements made relatively close in time by a woman about a man. However, the woman was convicted in one case but acquitted in the other.

Jaguar replica sportscar does not constitute copyright infringement

Rättsfall | Sverige

This case concerns a dispute between international car manufacturer Jaguar and a Swedish company, as well as the company's two owners, regarding allegations of copyright infringement in the defendants' production of a replica Jaguar C-Type sportscar.(1) The second-instance Patent and Market Court of Appeal reversed the first instance-court's decision and found that the replica did not constitute copyright infringement on two unusual grounds:

Till notiser

Artiklar av Catarina Holtz

Hänskjutning till EPO:s Stora besvärskammare – behörighet och befogenhet – G 3/19 | NIR 4/2020

Debatt. Besvärskamrarna vid EPO – uppfyller ledamöternas villkor artikel 6 Europeiska konventionen om mänskliga rättigheter och grundläggande friheter? | NIR 1/2018

Vad betyder EPO:s beslut R 19/12 för besvärskamrarna? | NIR 4/2014

Invändning först efter patentbeslut. Kan detta ha haft inverkan på kravet på uppfinningshöjd vid EPO? | NIR 2/2009

Debatt | NIR 1/2004

EPO Case law on equivalance in novelty, inventive step and amendments. | NIR 3/1999

Litteratur | NIR 1/1998

Article 55(1)(a) EPC. Abuce – Grace Period | NIR 1/1997

The Outer Limits of Patentability – Biotechnology | NIR 1/1996

Begränsningen av processmaterialet och besvärsrätten – rättsutveckling vid EPO | NIR 2/1994

Rättspraxis i EPO ang art 122 EPC "återställande av försutten tid". Särskilt om innebörden av omsorgskravet | NIR 2/1993