Artiklar av Ole-Andreas Rognstad

Repercussions of the RAAP judgment – some introductory remarks | NIR 4/2022

Gunnar Karnell, Äres dem som äras bör!, Gunnar Karnells rättsvetenskapligt syftande 39 festskriftartiklar till 38 adressater, mest till kolleger 1970–2017, eddy.se ab, Visby 2018 | NIR 3/2021

Book review

Det nordiske ”handlingsrommet” på opphavsrettsområdet i lys av EU-/EØS-retten – særlig om enerettighetene | NIR 1/2020

Nordic Copyright Law in Light of EU/EEA Law – in Particular the Exclusive Rights

Høyesterett og Il Tempo Gigante – en kommentar til advokat Rune Ljostads artikkel i NIR 2018 s. 394 | NIR 4/2018

The Norwegian Supreme Court and Il Tempo Gigante – a commentary to attorney Rune Ljostad’s article in NIR 2018 p. 394

The CJEU’s Recent Findings on Digital Exhaustion and Linking and their Impact on Nordic Copyright Law | NIR 6/2015

Jon Bing in memoriam | NIR 2/2014

Avtalelisens som nordisk løsningsmodell – Noen refleksjoner, særlig knyttet til avtalelisensens legitimitet i utlandet | NIR 6/2012

Extended Collective License as a Nordic Model of Solution – Some Reflexions, Particularly Concerning its Legitimacy Abroad

Søkemotorer på Internett i opphavsrettslig belysning | NIR 4/2012

Search Engines on the Internet in a Copyright Perspective

Birger Stuevold Lassen (1927–2011) | NIR 1/2012

Birger Stuevold Lassen In Memoriam

Vern for utøvende kunstnere. Kommentar tilHøyesteretts dom av 25. mars 2010 (Rt. 2010s. 366) (Gørild Mauseth) | NIR 6/2011

Protection of performers rights. A comment on the decision by the Norwegian Supreme Court of 25 March 2010 (Rt. 2010 p. 366) (Gørild Mauseth)

Opphavsrettens innhold i en multimedieverden – om tradisjonelle opphavsrettsbegrepers møte med digital teknologi | NIR 6/2009

Forledet av sceneinstruksjoner, men neppe av huldra. Kommentar til Huldra-dommen (Rt. 2007 s. 1329) II | NIR 2/2009

Seduced by scene instructions, but scarcely by the siren. A comment on the decision by the Norwegian Supreme Court in Rt. 2007 s. 1329q

Kommentar til Sø- og Handelsrettens dom av 24.02.2006 (Ofir-dommen) II. Faller boligdatabaser utenfor databasevernet, og kan vernet suppleres av markedsføringsloven? | NIR 4/2007

A commentary on the decision of the Maritime and Trade Court of February 24, 2006 (the Ofir decision) II. Do databases about housing conditions fall outside the scope of data base protection or may protection be supplemented by the Marketing Practices Act?

Parallellimport, ”co-branding” og domenenavn. En analyse av Rt. 2004 s. 904 (Paranova) og Rt. 2004 s. 1474 (Volvoimport.no) | NIR 1/2006

Parallell import, “co-banding” and domain names. An analysis of Rt 2004 p. 904 (Paranova) and Rt 2004 p. 1474 (Volvoimport.no)

Opphavsrettslig ansvar for linker på Internett. Noen betraktninger i lys av norsk Høyesteretts dom i Napster.no-saken | NIR 4/2005

Copyright responsibility for Internet links. Remarks in the light of the decision of the Supreme Court in the Napster.no-case

Fra norsk rettspraksis | NIR 3/2005

Norwegian cases

Fra norsk rettspraksis | NIR 6/2004

Norwegian cases

Kort kommentar til Høyesteretts dommer i Paranova- og Volvoimport.no-sakene {Parallel imports of trade mark goods in Norway. A short commentary to two resent cases before the Norwegian Supreme Court} | NIR 6/2004

Avtalelisenser | NIR 2/2004

Extended collective license agreements

Ett harmoniserat immaterialrättsligt sanktionssystem | NIR 4/2003

A harmonized intellectual property system of sanctions

Fra norsk rettspraksis | NIR 2/2003

Norwegian cases

Fra norsk rettspraksis | NIR 3/2002

Norwegian cases

Fra norsk rettspraksis | NIR 2/2002

Norwegian cases

Mot en ny immaterialrettsprosess i Europa | NIR 4/2000

Towards a new intellectual property litigation procedure in Europe

Om forholdet mellom retten til parallellimport og nasjonale regler om markedsføring | NIR 3/2000

The relation between the right to parallel import and national rules about marketing

Notiser

Distinctiveness for non-traditional trademarks and the inherent distinctiveness for surface patterns (PMCA, PMÄ 14666-22)

Rättsfall | Sverige

In this case regarding a trademark application for a geometrical figure as a surface pattern, the PMCA provide guidelines in relation to distinctiveness in relation to surface trademarks, and particularly the assessment for its inherited distinctiveness. This case further elaborates on the responsibilities an applicant holds in relation to showing distinctiveness for signs, patterns or products that are not typically associated with being trademarks.

The balance of the law on the peace of the maritime grave at the wreck of Estonia and the journalistic interest (the Court of Appeal for Western Sweden, B 5637-22)

Rättsfall | Sverige

The balance of the law on the peace of the maritime grave at the wreck of Estonia and the journalistic interest (the Court of Appeal for Western Sweden, B 5637-22) Filip Jerneke and Stefan Widmark Introduction In this case, two persons were convicted for offence against the law on the peace of the maritime grave at the wreck of the passenger vessel Estonia after diving close to and filming the wreck for the purpose of making a documentary film. In this context, the most interesting aspect is how the court draws the line between the peace of the maritime grave and the journalistic interest.

Gross defamation – similar statements in different media resulting in different judgements (Stockholm District Court, B 568-21 and Svea Court of Appeal B 374-20)

Rättsfall | Sverige

Whether defamation is made in constitutionally protected or other media can have decisive effect. This is shown in two judgments from Stockholm District Court and the Svea Court of Appeal. The cases concern similar statements made relatively close in time by a woman about a man. However, the woman was convicted in one case but acquitted in the other.

Jaguar replica sportscar does not constitute copyright infringement

Rättsfall | Sverige

This case concerns a dispute between international car manufacturer Jaguar and a Swedish company, as well as the company's two owners, regarding allegations of copyright infringement in the defendants' production of a replica Jaguar C-Type sportscar.(1) The second-instance Patent and Market Court of Appeal reversed the first instance-court's decision and found that the replica did not constitute copyright infringement on two unusual grounds:

Till notiser