Artiklar av Eva Aaen Skovbo

Sanktioner for uberettiget brug af arkitekttegninger. Kommentar til Højesterets dom af 6. januar 2011 (Skipperhuse) | NIR 2/2012

Remedies for Abusive Use of Architectural Drawings. A comment to the Decision of the Danish Supreme Court of January 6 2011 (Skipperhuse)

Højesteret afliver ”dobbelt-op-princippet” i relation til erstatningsudmåling for ophavsretlige krænkelser af digitalt tilgængelige værker. Kommentar til Højesterets afgørelse af 24. marts 2011 (Direct Connect) | NIR 2/2012

The Supreme Court Dismisses the “Double Up-principle” in the Calculation of Damages According to Infringements of the Danish Copyrigt Act. A comment to the Decision of the Danish Supreme Court of Mars 24 2011 (Direct Connect)

Fra dansk domspraksis | NIR 2/2012

Danish Case Law

Fra dansk domspraksis | NIR 2/2012

Danish Case Law

Fra dansk domspraksis | NIR 2/2010

Danish case law

Beviser ved gyldighed af patent og brugsmodelregistrering samt erstatningsudmåling – en kommentar til U2009.733H (Sættevogn) | NIR 2/2010

Evidence for validity of patent and utility model registration and calculation of compensation – a comment to the decision by the Danish Supreme Court U2009.733H (Semi-trailer)

Fra dansk domspraksis | NIR 3/2009

Danish case law

Erstatning for markedsforstyrrelser og godtgørelse svarende til passende licensafgift ved patentkrænkelser – en kommentar til U 2007.1219 (H) | NIR 3/2009

Compensation for the negative economic consequences and lost profits to the amount of royalties in patent infringements – a comment on the decision by the Danish Supreme Court (U 2007.1219 (H))

Fra dansk domspraksis | NIR 2/2009

Danish case law

Aftale, registrering og ibrugtagning. Kommentar til U 2007.2042 H (Asani) | NIR 2/2009

Agreement, registration and use. A comment on the decision by the Danis Supreme Cort in U 2007.2042 H (Asani)

Hjemmelsproblemer i dansk ret med hensyn til erstatning og straf i sager om krænkelse af EF-design og EF-varemærker | NIR 6/2007

Entitlement problems in Danish law about damages and penalties in cases of infringement of EC-design and EC trade marks

Nye regler om godtgørelse og erstatning for produktefterligninger i Danmark – er området i udvikling? | NIR 2/2006

New rules about compensation and damages for product copying in Denmark – a developing domain?

Webbinarier

2025-04-22

Tidskriften Nordiskt Immateriellt Rättsskydd (NIR) bjuder in till ett webbinarium på temat Långsamt farväl till specialitetsgrundsatsen

Notiser

Distinctiveness for non-traditional trademarks and the inherent distinctiveness for surface patterns (PMCA, PMÄ 14666-22)

Rättsfall | Sverige

In this case regarding a trademark application for a geometrical figure as a surface pattern, the PMCA provide guidelines in relation to distinctiveness in relation to surface trademarks, and particularly the assessment for its inherited distinctiveness. This case further elaborates on the responsibilities an applicant holds in relation to showing distinctiveness for signs, patterns or products that are not typically associated with being trademarks.

The balance of the law on the peace of the maritime grave at the wreck of Estonia and the journalistic interest (the Court of Appeal for Western Sweden, B 5637-22)

Rättsfall | Sverige

The balance of the law on the peace of the maritime grave at the wreck of Estonia and the journalistic interest (the Court of Appeal for Western Sweden, B 5637-22) Filip Jerneke and Stefan Widmark Introduction In this case, two persons were convicted for offence against the law on the peace of the maritime grave at the wreck of the passenger vessel Estonia after diving close to and filming the wreck for the purpose of making a documentary film. In this context, the most interesting aspect is how the court draws the line between the peace of the maritime grave and the journalistic interest.

Gross defamation – similar statements in different media resulting in different judgements (Stockholm District Court, B 568-21 and Svea Court of Appeal B 374-20)

Rättsfall | Sverige

Whether defamation is made in constitutionally protected or other media can have decisive effect. This is shown in two judgments from Stockholm District Court and the Svea Court of Appeal. The cases concern similar statements made relatively close in time by a woman about a man. However, the woman was convicted in one case but acquitted in the other.

Jaguar replica sportscar does not constitute copyright infringement

Rättsfall | Sverige

This case concerns a dispute between international car manufacturer Jaguar and a Swedish company, as well as the company's two owners, regarding allegations of copyright infringement in the defendants' production of a replica Jaguar C-Type sportscar.(1) The second-instance Patent and Market Court of Appeal reversed the first instance-court's decision and found that the replica did not constitute copyright infringement on two unusual grounds:

Till notiser